Long-term Background of the Holocaust

 

Antisemitism:  coined in 1879 by German journalist Wilhelm Marr

*  Jews were a separate race, the Semite race (descended from Noah’s son Shem)

 

How many races do anthropologists say there are in the world today?  -- Only 3, maybe 4.  Name them if you can.  – White, black, and Oriental.  Or Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid.  Some scientists wonder what to do with the Australian aborigines, as they don’t really fit with any of the other groups.  So the Jews are obviously not a race.

 

*  The Jews are a people, a religion

*        Writing it this way (without a hyphen and a capital “S”) denies the idea of a separate race

*  An irrational hatred

*        “Jews are not hated because they have evil qualities; they are given evil qualities so they can be hated.”

*  From the Orthodox point of view, antisemitism goes back to Sinai

 

The Orthodox are extremely conservative in their view of the law.  For them, the statement we looked at earlier that Jews became God’s Chosen People shut out the other nations in the Middle East, thus generating animosity between Israel and her neighbors.

 

*  Antisemitism has waxed and waned through time and place

 

Pagan times:  reasons

*  Economic:  Jews competed with non-Jews, particularly in Alexandria

*        Jews vs. Hellenized Greeks and Egyptians

*  Political:  Maccabean conquests, c. 140 BCE

*  Cultural:  pagans resented monotheism and its demands and separatism

*        Messianism:  Greeks and Romans had a problem here

*        Jews made up 10-12% of Roman Empire

*        Tacitus (1st C. CE):  was harshly against Jews

*  Popular antisemitism generally isn’t found

*        Most antisemitism in the ancient world was confined to the intellectual elites

Christian times:

*  Jews refuted:

*        Jesus as the Messiah

*        The Trinity

*        God became human

*        Abrogation of the Law

*        Original sin

 

What’s this mean?  -- That because of the fall of Adam and Eve, all future humans are born sinners and are damned unless they become saved.

 

*        Faith in Jesus as only way to salvation

*        Sacraments of the Church

 

Let me have a Catholic, or anyone who remembers this from your world history class, state these for the us now:  -- They are baptism, holy orders, anointing of the sick (or last rites), marriage, reconciliation (or confession), communion, and confirmation.  – For the most part, one would be hard-pressed to find Biblical laws for these.

 

*        New Testament as Divine

*  Jews were accused of deicide (murder of God/Jesus)

*        Matthew 27:  “let the punishment for His death fall upon us and our children”

 

Who is “us”?  -- The Jews.  – Why would they say this?  -- Pilate offered to turn Jesus back to the Jews and not execute him; Pilate was concerned that if he really was the king of the Jews that the Jews would revolt against the Romans.  The Jews told Pilate to keep Jesus and free another prisoner named Barabbas.  So Jesus in a way was executed by the Jews.  – We can draw this conclusion if the New Testament scriptures are what we consult for this problem.  However, please be aware that there is a body of literature, most notably from Flavius Josephus, a Jew who served in the Roman army in the 1st Century and wrote extensively on his experiences there, as well as a history of the Jews of the time.  His work is considered reliable, although astute readers will recognize Josephus’ attempts to discredit marginal religions of the period, of which Christianity was one of many (Carroll 70).  We must be careful to not be so one-sided in our thinking.  We must keep in perspective that Jesus lived a life that was historical, not just theological in nature.  He was a real person, and the events of his life are somewhat cloudy, given the timeframe for the recording of those events some 70 years minimum after his passing.  I would invite any of you to call me up in 70 years and accurately tell me what we did today…

 

*  Arguments over meaning of Old Testament/Hebrew Bible

*        Christians wanted to take Hebrew verses to prove Jesus was the Messiah

*  Christians came to be seen as the new “chosen people”

*        Jews were superceded, rejected by God

 

Of course, Muslims believe they have a newer revelation yet…

 

*        Their rejection suggested to some Christians the Jews were in league with Satan

*  Stereotypes

*        Judas, the ultimate betrayer

 

What was Judas given to turn Jesus over to the authorities?  -- 30 pieces of silver.  And what is one of the stereotypes or associations about Jews?  -- That they are lovers of money.  – Or misers.

 

*        Jews were also personified as Cain, a murderer and ceaseless wanderer

*  70 CE:  Jews were crushed by Romans

*        Again in 115-17 and 132-35 CE

*  Jews were driven out of Israel and entered a Diaspora

*  4th Century CE:  Christianity became legal in Rome, then the official religion

*        Christian thinking about Jews became codified

*        Theodosius, 4th C.

*        Justinian, 7th C

*        Jews were still to be tolerated by law but as second class citizens

*        St. Augustine, 4th C:  “the witness people”

*        Jews should live, in a degraded condition to a) show what happens to those who reject Christ, and b) witnessing through their Hebrew prophecies about the coming of Christ

*        St. John Chrysostum, 4th C:  sermons in Antioch that railed harshly against the Jews (“God hates the Jews…”)

 

I read an excerpt from one of Chrysostum’s sermons at this point.  See the Medieval Sourcebook, hosted by Fordham University:

 

http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/chrysostom-jews6.html

 

*        Pope Gregory, 6th C:  conversion of the Jews preferred; they must be tolerated

 

Early Middle Ages (500-1000)

*  Relationship between Jews and Christians was civil

*  Charlemagne invited Jews to come in because they were international merchants

 

Again, the association with money or finance.

 

*  Visigoths instituted antisemitic legislation

*        Moors were more lenient, after 711 CE

 

Charles Martel defeated the Muslims at the Battle of Tours in France in 732 – this may be the single most important victory for Christianity in its history.  This event always makes me think of what science fiction guys call “divergent timelines” – the idea that if even one event never happened, or happened differently, or if a particular person never lived, all of time would have gone in a different direction.  – I think that sounds more like George Bailey and the angel in “It’s a Wonderful Life”!

 

High Middle Ages (1000-1300)

*  1096:  1st Crusade to Holy Land began

*        As the Christians crossed Europe, they carried out violence against the Jews

 

Who were the Crusaders supposed to be against?  -- The Muslims.  But since the Jews were also not Christians, the Crusaders put several hundred, more likely thousands, to the sword and stake on the way to Jerusalem.

 

*  1144:  Norwich, England

*        First ritual murder accusation – Jews allegedly killed a child to use his blood in a ritual to bake matzah

 

The blood libel will turn up again and again throughout the next 800 years.  What do you know from your chapter in the Grobman text, “Who Are the Jews?” about the Jews and blood?  -- Blood is unclean to the Jews.  They have a ritual way to slaughter livestock and drain the blood out.  Meat is cooked to a well done state where there is no blood left in the meat.  Kosher regulations require this.

 

*  1179:  Third Lateran Council of church leaders from across Europe reaffirms Jewish second-class citizenship

 

What does “lateran” mean?  -- Lateral, like across.  So this was a meeting of bishops and other church fathers from across Europe.

 

*  1215:  Fourth Lateran Council called by Pope Innocent III

*        Jews must wear a patch (badge), because God marked Cain as a vagabond

 

As we said, the Nazis were many things, but original was not one of them.  Like the ghettos show up earlier, like the British used trains to transport Boers to camps, here we see the use of the patch to denote that the Jewish are part of “the other”.

 

*  1239:  Pope Gregory IX issued a bull condemning the Talmud for alleged anti-Christian references

*        Talmud burned in Paris a few years later

 

A bull would be like an edict – when a king issues a statement like this it’s called an edict.  The pope issues a bull.  Why would the Church condemn the Talmud?  What was unique about the clergy and the Bible in the Middle Ages?  -- The Bible was written in Latin, and only the Church officials could read Latin.  So the Church had the power to tell the people what the Bible said and what they should believe.  – Right.  But that was not true in Judaism; in their faith learning is a great virtue.  To study is one of the highest ways to honor God.  – So the fear was that the Jews could think for themselves and that would compromise the power of the Church…

 

Later Middle Ages (1300-1500)

*  1347-52:  Black Death killed 25-33% of population of Europe

*        Jews blamed for poisoning the wells

*        Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, and France put entire Jewish communities to the sword

*  1391:  riots began in Seville and spread throughout Spain after sermons by a fanatical priest

*        Unlike in the past, many Jews converted

*        conversos, or marranos (pigs)

 

Why would the term for pigs be particularly offensive to Jews?  -- They don’t eat pork.  Yes, but it goes beyond that.  Can anyone relate the story of the prodigal son from the parable Jesus told?  -- The son asked his father for his inheritance.  The father gave it, and the son went off to the big city and wasted it on wine, women, and song.  -- Then what happened?  -- He was penniless, so he had to get a job caring for hogs.  -- Right – but he also had to sleep with them and eat what they ate.  This would have greatly compromised an important Jewish law.  So to refer to the converts as pigs was quite a slap…

 

*  1411:  eventually, Christians turned against the conversos

*        more anti-Jewish riots and conversions

*  1480:  Spanish Inquisition began

*        Went not after the Jews, but the conversos

 

This is important – while the Jews were certainly persecuted in their own right, the Inquisition was primarily after those who might be living a lie.  – Claiming Christianity on the outside, but secretly practicing Jewish rituals…How could someone go before the Inquisition?  -- In some cases the Inquisition went out to the villages and towns; in others, people were brought to a central place.  The thing about the Inquisition that was a real challenge for people was that anyone could accuse you of heresy, and it was not up to them to prove that you were, it was up to you to prove that you were not.  In many cases, just to have been accused was a sign of guilt.

 

*        limpieza de sangra = purity of the blood

*        Beginnings of racial antisemitism

 

I’ll say this a hundred times:  the Nazis were many things, but original was not one of them.

 

*        mala sangra = bad blood

*        Many conversos were burned at the stake        

 

What or who has this particular death sentence been associated with over the centuries?  -- Witches and other heretics.  – That’s what Joan of Arc was accused of.

 

*  1492:  Ferdinand and Isabella expelled Jews and Muslims after the conquest of Grenada

*        Jews had been expelled from England (1290), France (1304), and German lands (but never completely from Germany)

*  1497:  expulsion from Portugal

*        More forced conversions

*  1500:  there was no one living as a practicing Jew in any country bordering the Atlantic

*        Jewish focus shifted to the East

*        Turks, some Poles (but not the Catholic Church in Poland) welcomed the Jews

*        Jews had been forced out of land-holding, guilds; money-lending (usury) became main economic activity

*        Jews were seen as “royal sponges”, because they worked as tax collectors

 

Think about a sponge.  What happens when it is squeezed and released under the water?  -- It fills up.  – And what happens when it is raised out of the water and squeezed?  -- It empties out.  Oh, so that’s what the kings were doing – using the Jews to take tax money or whatever, and then taxing them to the extent that they sucked all of the money out of them.  Then the Jews were let back to do their money lending again.

 

At the conclusion of this lesson, I put an overhead of a detailed description of the Chelmnicki massacres of 1648 (Landau 44-5).  To say the least, students left that day with a heavy heart. 

 

I have received numerous comments through our previous studies of slavery and Indian removal that they don’t often leave my room not-depressed.  My goal is certainly not to beat them down or discourage them on the virtues of humanity.  But they do leave thinking, and more aware of their pasts and how important it is to learn from the mistakes of previous generations, and of others around the world.  We often relate our material to current events, and I firmly believe these young people are obtaining a new appreciation of history and its lessons.  I hope so…

 

*  1517:  Luther launched the Protestant Reformation

*        At first befriended Jews, hoping to convert them

*  1543:  Luther issued a violent pamphlet against Jews

 

At this point I read an excerpt from a diatribe that Luther made against the Jews (ibid. 46-7).  The kids were astounded at the way Luther railed against the Jews.  And again, in Luther’s multi-point plan of action for Jewish persecution, I reminded the students that the Nazis borrowed from many ideas of the past.  Students also made the connection that the fact that Luther was German made it easier for the Nazis to use his writings for their propaganda purposes.

 

*  1555:  spread of ghetto system in Europe

*        The “Rome ghetto” under lock and key

*        Part of Counter-Reformation

*  By the end of the Middle Ages, the Jew had been reduced to less than human; and linked to the Devil

The link between Christian antisemitism and the Holocaust:

*  Causation for the Holocaust is all here:  antisemitism exists where there are no Jews, in definitions, stereotypes, etc.

Counter-arguments –

*  There is a difference between antisemitism and anti-Judaism

*  There are pro-Jewish passages in the New Testament

*  The Jews could escape from pre-Holocaust persecution by baptism